Walt Mossberg Reviews New Samsung Galaxy S Android Phones ★
Walt Mossberg:
I’ve been testing the first two Galaxy S phones, the T-Mobile Vibrant and the AT&T Captivate, both of which cost $200 with a two-year contract. Neither has all the features of Apple’s latest model, like a front-facing camera for video calls or an ultra–high resolution screen, but they are worthy competitors. They have some attributes the iPhone lacks, like bigger screens and better integration of social networking.
They sound like good — maybe the best? — Android phones. What I find interesting is that “Galaxy S” is Samsung’s branding, but the phones aren’t called that. Each carrier gives them their own names. How many real people will know that the T-Mobile Vibrant and AT&T Captivate are pretty much the same phone from different carriers? And “Android” doesn’t get mentioned at all. The word “Android” doesn’t get much play from the carriers, either. There’s just one mention of “Android” on AT&T’s web page for the Captivate, and it’s near the bottom in the small print section
John Gruber, author of the most excellent daring fireball, comments above on Walt Mossbergs review of the new Samsung Galaxy phones.
I had some time Sunday to go peruse phones at Verizon, Tmobile and Sprint, and because I did, I am able to make some comments on the above.
The Samsung Galaxy S on Sprint, is far and way the best android handset I’ve used so far, it is truly excellent.
How so? Well the interface is the smoothest I’ve seen on android, possibly equal to the nexus one, but I think smoother. The screen is beautiful, the thinness is lovely, and best of all, probably to convince iPhone people to switch, they’ve made the applications appear in a horizontal page by page grid a la iPhone instead of up and down endless like all other androids I’ve seen. I’m not sure if that only makes me happy, or if it will work for all iPhone people, but I can tell you scrolling up and down the general android apple list feels Frey alien, whereas the samsungs feels nice.
Not only that, but in my surveys of android phones over the last few months, they all stutter when swiping or moving ui elements around in comparison to even my original iPhone. But the Galaxy S? It’s smoother and faster than my iPhone.
Pretty sweet, huh? More responsive than my iPhone(not than an iPhone 4 of course), beautiful screen, open android and so on, lovely.
So let’s get one right? Wait, it costs the SAME as an iPhone. Like exactly the same, monthly, plus up front, it’s all the same.
Well, I guess it better do all the same stuff then, let’s see.
No video camera for face time.
That’s a deal breaker for most anybody.
But let’s say I’m a geek who wants google voice, or more openness. How would I choose?
Well I’m a geek with a l ot of international friends so I’ll go to the android store and get Skype. Oh no Skype on the store? Okay
Well, android has built in tethering, that makes up for no video camera or Skype right? Oh tethering comes with froyo 2.2, which could take a month or six months to arrive, who knows, and will Tmobile charge an extra $30 per month for it? Who knows? And Tmobile aren’t saying.
So nothing killer selling me on this phone, but it is slick. So you could call it a tie.
But then, take in the factors that nobody counts. Take in iTunes U and it’s awesome amount of university education that is built into every iPhone for free, and doesn’t technically even require ATT, you could just sit in starbucks all day learning and learning on your iPhone.
Then take Siri, the absolutely mind blowingly artificial intelligence app for iPhone, that will never be available for android because apple just bought it.
And toss up the above and decide which phone is worth your $200, and $70 monthly.
One more thing.
I had a nice Sony Ericsson phone before the iPhone came out, I was happy with it, it was a Walkman, made great calls, and took good pictures, I wasn’t dead certain I needed the iPhone over this Sony. Then I was walking down the street one day and listening to some songs, I saw a beautiful view and took out the phone to take a picture, opened the camera app and took a picture, know what happened? The song paused(not gracefully) while the camera presumably buffered and saved the image, then the song resumed a millisecond before where it had stopped(horrible).
I went to the apple store, started playing a song on the iPhone, opened camera, took a picture, the iPhone didn’t miss a beat. Why pay $70 a month for a phone that’s going to bug me every time I’m listening to a song and want to take a picture? And I got the iPhone and loved it.
Nobody notices this, nobody.
People buy stuff all the time, and it doesn’t do perfect everything, normal people don’t rant and rave like i do about this, normal people just continue their lives, buy a canon to take pictures along their Sony and continue.
But iPhone buyers, normal people, are listening to music, taking pictures, chatting on the phone simultaneously in the playgrounds with their kids, while Sony Ericsson, motorola and nokia owners aren’t. Can their phones not do all these things at once or do these people not wanna do it? I put it to you that it’s that their phones can’t do it and they just don’t think a second thought about it. Well listen to this, that galaxy s that we began this discussion about, go try it out, go marvel at its beauty at how slick it is, comparable it is, awesome it is, then make a call on it and open the camera app.
Yknow what you’ll see? “camera can’t be used while on a call”
These are the things that matter, people don’t notice them, but when everything is perfect and aligned, they don’t have to, they just get used to cup holders, and niceties, and while samsung catch up to make their camera app work while a call is happening, apple are steaming ahead with iOS 5, which will have built in Siri, who can book you on a flight, reserve you dinner, your hotel, and, take a photo while doing all that.
Now Cupertino, please make it so I can shoot video while on a call, iPhone 4 doesn’t do that, and why not?
.